Dan Petersen

My feedback

  1. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Petersen supported this idea  · 
  2. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Petersen supported this idea  · 
  3. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Petersen supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Petersen supported this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Petersen commented  · 

    SilkPerformer supports the Citrix protocol but not VMware using the PCOIC protocol, which is now more popular. In the future we are planning on replacing our physical PC workstations with VMware virtual desktops and run virtual applications hosted on VMware, so we need SilkPerformer to support PCOIC protocol.

    Dan Petersen supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base