Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  StarTeam Feature Requests » StarTeam Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is no longer impacting teams I work with since most have moved over to Git.

    Once a VCM session is created it locks files in the target view that will get modified as part of the merge. Some users who have rights to break a lock sometimes break the lock and modify the file w/o checking why it was locked which I agree is irritating, but when someone later attempts to commit the VCM session they are presented with a message that one of mote files are changed and asks if they want to close or restart the VCM session, neither of which offer them a way to move forward w/o having to redo merges for all those merges that they have already spent time resolving and are not affected bu those modifications in the target view.

    In the above scenario, the VCM session should not only identify the files that got changed (thereby preventing the VCM session from being committed) but also offer the user the option for it to re-compare just those files that got modified so that they can resolve just those merges/conflicts while keeping intact the resolutions that have been done and are not affected.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  StarTeam Feature Requests » StarTeam Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This should be basic functionality of any good version control tool and I am surprised that this is missing form StarTeam, or rather involves a large # of steps to get this information. I get that this may now be available using "stcmd" but this should be easy to query via the CPC as well

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  StarTeam Feature Requests » Frontend  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  StarTeam Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base