Thanuj Pandian

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 
    Thanuj Pandian commented  · 

    Basically, this is to identify a performance issue due to a code change and not due to load. This also helps to more effectively compare user response times under load. Eg. Lets say SLA for a particular page is 5secs, While I run a load test the response time for that page is 8 secs because of a recent code change; Now I do a tuning and redo the test and process continues as long as the desired result is achieved. So, I'm running multiple load tests to identify and fix a simple code issue which can be achieved by just running a single user test instead of a load test. If a single user accessing the application is having issues (response time greater than that of SLA defined), then any number of users accessing will also face the issue.

    Currently we are using the below code/logic to achieve this via project attributes and I can tell you it is a pain when multiple scripts are involved; 20 in our case.

    var gbSync : boolean;

    // Transactions Section
    dcltrans
    transaction TInit
    begin
    gbSync := AttributeGetBoolean("isSynchronized");
    if gbSync then
    GlobalResourceEnter("1ScriptAtOnceOnly");
    end;
    end TInit;

    transaction TEnd
    begin
    if gbSync then
    GlobalResourceRelease("1ScriptAtOnceOnly");
    end;
    end TEnd;

    Thanuj Pandian shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 
    Thanuj Pandian shared this idea  · 
  3. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 
  6. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Performer Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thanuj Pandian supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base