Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk Test Workbench  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk4J/Silk4Net  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk Test Workbench  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk Test Workbench  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Just to clarify; it would be useful to have the option to define how many passed or failed results assets to keep for all scripts. For example: Save "x" number of results. This would allow us to specify whatever number of maximum results to keep without having to use the purge tool to maintain the records. Rather than running the purge on a regular schedule to all but last 3 Results; it would be nice if we could configure the system to save no more than 3 failed results. This would allow the system to self maintain the number of results files.

    Setting this on a per-script level would be more overhead and maintenance; so we just want to be able to define something like the following:

    Passed: Overwrite existing run number with new Results.
    Failed: Save maximum of "X" results with a new run number.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  8. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk Test Workbench  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Test Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base