Gianni

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni supported this idea  · 
  7. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have a item on our backlog which relates to deleted tests first moving to a ‘Obselete’ folder on first delete. This allows them to be reviewed prior to final delete. This is in line with how we handle requirement deletion.

    We will add your feedback to out item on backlog.

    Gianni supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Silk Central 18.0 will introduce a enhancement within IM which will include for example introduction of issue grid allowing the viewing of issues across 1 or more inboxes, view of all issues ect. The issue grid will allow filtering, grouping against all IM fields, and export of data to excel.

    Review of Issue Manager is underway

    Gianni commented  · 

    Hi, regarding the creating of IM template, I agree with Micky.
    we use a Project template to generate new SCTM and IM project quicly and we have to zap sctm/im database to do what.
    Gianni

    Gianni commented  · 

    Hi,
    I agree with Kefeng, there are several possible improvements into SCTM, like more capability to set the custom fields mandatory at specific action, but I have a prayer.
    In our organization we are moving all the developers team to use SCIM, so please don't remove any of the existing capabilities as done in other context (like manual test interface) without consider the potential impact to existing users (and business).
    Thanks
    Gianni

  9. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have introduced the manual test result viewer which will allow the view of in progress tests in a rich context which shows attachments and associated defects as well as showing the results for completed test runs.

    This is online and you can print or PDF it.

    We are looking to modify the business logic that will support result management across a wider scope.

    Gianni supported this idea  · 
    Gianni commented  · 

    I checked the news in SCTM v13 and the new manual testing interface, but this need is not adressed.
    The tester need to have always evidence of a valid 'last test result', and we cannot consider valid a 'not executed' status automatically set by SCTM for a test rerun.
    I can show you tons of cases where this condition created a great confusion and don't allow to understand the real state of progress of the project.
    Comparing to other tool when a test is launched its status is 'neutral' or 'to be executed', preserving the last 'previous' status) and don't overlay a previous status until the tester decide to do it setting a new real status.
    The impact is also very high on reporting, so we must create external table to save the results of SCTM setting the result 'valid' and 'not valid'.
    Where a test is in a running EP (status=7) its 'not executed' status is considered valid only if a previous status doesn't exist. In this way we can offer a real test execution reporting.
    thanks

  11. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni shared this idea  · 
  13. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gianni supported this idea  · 
    Gianni shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base