Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    More Info Needed  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    column name is 'UseSharedStepsNodeID_fk' in table 'TM_ManualSteps'

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Archie,

    as I mentioned before a method to stop in API is better because than our automation-script can decide when it makes sense to stop. With the interface method all errors stop the testsuite. I don't want to stop the complete testsuite which have only simple and not critical errors.

    In short - I only want to stop on critical errors and sctm don't know what is a critical error (of course). So I need a API to define that.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Florian,

    I think a method in the API would be better because then you can decide on which error a testsuite should be stopped. For example only on critical errors.

    Thanks,
    Ben

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have a item on our backlog which relates to deleted tests first moving to a ‘Obselete’ folder on first delete. This allows them to be reviewed prior to final delete. This is in line with how we handle requirement deletion.

    We will add your feedback to out item on backlog.

  9. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Test Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request » Silk Test Classic  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Stefan,

    functions for read and write XML documents.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  12. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base