Michael

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    Request via incident #2651817 and RPI #1089823

  2. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    Requested also in support incident #2652528.

    This customer would like to be able to report on the total number of passed verifications, the total number of failed verifications and the total number of steps executed by all SilkTest Workbench scripts within an execution run from Silk Central.

    Therefore they would like this SilkTest Workbench test information to be stored in the Silk Central database.

  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    The browser starts to send keep-alive requests every minute and with the first keep-alive request the session timeout is changed on the server to 100 seconds. Therefore when closing the browser the session should be invalidated after around 2 minutes and the license should be released.

    However if the browser is left open with SCTM then at the moment, the license is not released. However for a future version of SCTM we are planning to change this behaviour to display a warning message for example "you have been inactive for ... , do you want to continue working?".

    I have done some more testing and the license gets released on my system after a couple of minutes if I close the complete browser window. If you only close the tab that SCTM was using then the license does not get released.

  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    It is possible to set these rules InActive directly from the database however it is not recommended as they are not designed to be set InActive. Also note we cannot support any changes you make directly on the database. Due to this we cannot assist further with any problems you may have with this if you decide to make the database change.The table in the database that controls this is IM_NotifyRule

    If you do not wish to receive these notifications I would suggest you take out the email address from users profiles in SCTM or disable the email notifications altogether by removing the email server details.

  6. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    Requested through support incident #2640483

  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  9. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    Requested via incident # 2586137

    Michael shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    Requested through support incident #2585370

  13. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  14. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    The title of this post should read "Remove execution plan email notification if using Test Cycles"

    Michael shared this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Silk Central Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael commented  · 

    This request is via incident #2582517

  16. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Silk Test Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base