We will be looking to add code-review to StarTeam for 16.2 (targeted for Oct/Nov 2017)
Hi Greg and Jorgen, although we didn't add this directly into StarTeam, we have added in the Rhythm product which is our Agile Project Management tool. Rhythm is included with StarTeam as a separate download.
more info needed – see comments
Can you provide more info on the context ? within the Manual Tests assigned to me there is a filter for this , as such please explain scenario for where you wish to see this.
This is a very valid request and we have discussed this already a couple of times. But at this stage such plugin is not planned.
Hi Ben, thanks for raising this idea. What would you most important feature (action recording, locator spy, object map, project-wizard, ...) from Silk4J that should be available in IntelliJ?
We'll be revisiting the Jenkins plugin integration with StarTeam later this year. We haven't had a lot of feedback until recently and we seem to be building enough of a backlog to have another release.
2 votesunder review · 2 comments · StarTeam Feature Requests » StarTeam Server · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Not sure why I didn't see your comment when you added it, but I found it a little bit ago. we'll evaluate this for possible consideration in 15.1 (we start planning for it in October/November).
Need to understand the LOE and if it’s something that we could plan for in a future release. Thanks!
We will re-evaluate this enhancement for a possible feature in 15.1. Planning will start in October/November.
What specific operations are you looking to have perform from a client side post-promote trigger that wouldn't work on the server? we typically avoid client-side triggers as much as possible because customers find them hard to manage. If a client machine doesn't have the trigger defined/enabled...it can easily by-pass process.
AccuRev doesn't have a Redmine intgeration. It's possible a customer wrote the integration themselves, but other than that AccuRev doesn't have an integration. I have added to our backlog Redmine as a possible connector with Borland Connect. If we end up building it, it will work for both AccuRev and StarTeam. Right now, it's only in the backlog with no commitment as we don't have enough customer demand.
This is being seriously considered for 16.2. Planning for the next release is about 1 month away (late April 2017). There’s been enough high votes for this functionality. It will take a lot of effort, but given the enormous support for this functionality we’re looking to see if it can be added to 16.2 (which is planned for Oct/Nov 2017).
Appreciate the request. Planning and development has already started for StarTeam 15.0. This specific request will be investigated for the next major release post 15.0. Thank you.
thanks for clarification. You are referring to the 'Assigned Tests' in the Test Assignment window.
We will review request and look that users can configure how this can be updated.
All images in the reports are stored as PNG. Further validation underway as to if the Capture() function will save images as PNG
There are a couple of ideas around this already.
Within Silk Performer and on the Cloud portal (https://cloud.borland.com/) you have full visibility into your Borland Credits account balance.
Bulk Drag and drop to user is available.
Where would you like to import the execution plan from ?
Please provide example and can discuss. Will email you direct
Please provide further information. Would being able to add datadriven properties through the datagrid in the test view be something which would help ?
Should be possible to select a set of test cases in SilkCentral , assigning or removing at the same time datadriven properties
In document view and grid view we introduced ability to download data to Excel for the purpose of reporting.
Please advise if this meets your needs over PDF.
Excel provides ability to then use data for reporting – PDF would be static
Creating PDF report on screen Grid View and Document View
Posted in Central Silk Feature Requests
In Test> Grid View and Document View menu could have a chance to generate PDF .
Are two very important for an overview of product testing screens , however there is no option to generate a report .
Please can you validate if the seperate permission for ‘Remove Execution plan’ resolves your issue.
currently you can set permissions to restict who can remove execution plans introduced in 15.5.
Further review to consider if can make execution plans obselete prior to delete.
review of users permissions will allow you to decide who can remove execution plans.
On backlog we have added user story to split delete tests and execution to different permissions.
if there is no further update will look to close this
The Issue ID is unique to silk central and is unique number. The external ID is not unique and is combined with the issue tracking system profile. As such if you want to associate issue number 3 for external ID then issue 3 will exist for say Jira, Bugzilla and issue manager systems.
Please provide further information why you would want to have the choice and use issue id OR External ID ? We would have to introduct a field to say what the ID is you are entering as this would not be able to be determined automatically and would increase complexity.
We suggest that in future versions of the Central Silk is possible to associate an existing issue a manual test case , during its execution , stating the number of the internal issue ( SilkCentral generated by itself) or external ID , generated by StarTeam .
Today it is only possible to associate an issue informing the External ID .
It would be nice to associate informing the internal or external number .
Deleting datasources could indicate which tests are using the spreadsheet data
Posted in Central Silk Feature Requests
When a datasource is already in use ( associated with some test cases with the option "Enable data-driven properties" enabled ) and you need to delete it or change it ( doing a Synchronize with the repository ) the only message that is displayed the datasource is in use .
There should be a tool in place to indicate which test cases are tied to this mass of data so you can disable it and take the necessary action ( update or delete ) .
It would also be interesting to be able to create a filter for the name of the datasource ( the only filter nearest mass of data can be done , if there is a test case that has enabled mass data) .
1 voteMore Info Needed · 3 comments · Silk Central Feature Requests · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Requirements without tests assigned are classed as a folder.
Review of data driven testing and validation for user of parameters
Since early versions of the SilkCentral deployed today is not very good support functionality parameters .
When you're writing a test case and write , for example , $ some_parameter in step . SilkCentral should automatically list it in the Parameters tab and flag state through what remains the definition of the parameter value.
If the user tries to run the test case , there should be an alert informing the user about the parameters that were used in the case of tests but have no defined value. Thus avoiding the problems that occur routinely test cases going to run with undefined parameters , making it necessary to abort the execution parameters and reset it to run again .
Also missing in the information of SilkCentral parameters are listed in Tab Parameters , but are not declared in any step of the test case . In this case, there should also be a flag indicating that the