Caliber Feature Requests

  1. Error using Document Factory

    The Microsoft warning message "Server Busy: This action cannot be completed because the other program is busy. Choose 'switch to' to activate the busy program and correct the problem.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Questions regarding Publish to Quality Center add trace option

    When we publish to quality center the option to add traces for published requirements by default is checked (=true), can this please be changed to unchecked (=false) by default?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Doc Factory report to show changes since date

    Is there a DocFactory option for a ‘summary of changes’ (in any iteration, since a date, since a baseline, etc.)

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Add Spanish to language list

    any plans to add Spanish to language list?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Trace modifcation window CTRL -Click not working on Quality Center tests

    In the trace modification window. You can hold ctrl on requirements and trace to/from all requirements (select multiple requirements to trace to.
    You can not do this when trying to select multiple QC items to trace to.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Caliber description Numbering Format Problems

    The numbering format in the description field does not match the functionality that is in word.

    The customer has noticed that when editing or deleting sections of text within the description field that the numbering format (e.g. 1.2.3) will jump about, also some indentation will move to the right.

    The customer wishes that the numbering format, when editing the text matches that of MS word. I have presented the customer with a work around or method of how they should use the numbering in that they use the delete key to move the next time up instead of keep using…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. SDK COM component 64 bits

    I ran an excel Macro that works on my Windows XP 32bit machine and it completed successfully, however like the customer it fails when ran on a x64bit system.

    The SDK code cannot login and displays "com.starbase.caliber.server.RemoteServerException:Caliber.IDLVERSIONNOTSUPPORTED:IDL:Caliber/IDLVERSIONNOTSUPPORTED:1.0"

    This was using the CaliberRMSDK101.dll, I tried the CaliberRMSDK100.dll too to see if it made a difference but both display the same result.

    This is CaliberRM 10.1 with HF1 applied

    The customer was also using Python and can get his SDK working on x32bit but not x64bit due to a com error

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Requirement grid - Type ahead feature

    Customer has requested “type – ahead” feature so that the combo box shows the user names as we type. This is similar to the search in Google (i.e AJAX) where the list of users is filtered/selected as we enter the user name in the combobox.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. UDA must always contain a value

    During creation of a requirement, a custom UDA must be given a value however during a modification this attributes can be saved empty.

    This is as designed for Caliber. Step 3 of 5 when you create the UDA has the option to ensure the UDA value is entered upon the requirement creation but the requirement can then be modified later to contain a empty value.

    Can an addition be made so that this UDA has to have a value for the life of the requirement?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Caliber author visualize steps ordering

    when using RM and Visualize in a integrated way, the Visualize scenario steps order displayed in RM is important for the customer while it reflects the logical sequence of actions related to a use case.
    Compare to what they got with Optimal Trace, they are now missing that capability while they can’t manage the Visualize scenario steps order displayed in RM. If a Visualize scenario step is inserted between two existing ones, it will be displayed in RM at the end of the steps list without any way to reorder the list.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Fully Automate publish baselines from Caliber to quality center

    By fully automate I mean that all variables including login to caliber, choose caliber project&baseline, login and choose HPQC domain and projects, selecting which requirement types/requirements to publish/update to HPQC and selecting varying UDA's.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. spellcheck of russian words

    Customer wants to know can Russian be added to the spell check list?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. CaliberRM and Terminal Server

    Make CaliberRM compatible with Terminal Server

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Establish highlighting on search/filter results

    Establish highlighting on search/filter results, like web searches perform today, that demonstrate why a requirement met filter criteria

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Configure Caliber Servername in crm Files by registry key

    The caliber Servername in the crm files is read from the server hostname. Changing the server and all older email has the wrong caliber servername. So change the servername for the crm mails to a registry key, so we can change it e.g. to a dns alias

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Please improve on reporting as well as integration with HP PPM tools

    Please improve on reporting as well as integration with HP PPM tools

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Ability to output user defined attributes of traced requirements in DocFactory

    Currently the DocFactory syntax supports the output of builtin requirement attributes of traced requirements when using the $begin_traces command.

    I would like to be able to output user defined attributes of traced requirements inside a $begin_traces command.

    18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Extend spell checker to cover requirement name and textual user defined attributes.

    It would be very useful if the spell checker could spell check requirement names and text user defined attributes in addition to descriptions.

    When I produce requirement specifications using the document factory I have perfectly spelt requirements, but Word immediately highlights all my errors (mostly typos) in the requirement name and in textual UDF fields.

    I would be useful if these could be highlighted at the point of entry.

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Ability to sort traced requirements by hierarchy ID

    Currently the $sorttraces syntax allows you to sort traced requirement in the $begintraces loop on a number of trace attributes. Unfortunately, there is no trace_ attribute that gives you access to the hierarchy ID.

    This prevents a user from outputting traced requirements in the sequence in which they appear in the Caliber hierarchy - potentially one of the most useful sequences.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Enable the filtering of Traces using DocFactory syntax

    The ability to break out traces based on a pre-defined attribute. For example, let's say I have a user defined attribute set up that captures the type of requirement - use case, business requirement, business rule, functional, non-functional.

    Within my project, I have a use case that traces from a Business requirement, and traces to business rules, functional requirements and non- functional requirements. Currently, when I produce a doc factory export using my SRS template, I can only filter on the trace type i.e. Trace From or Trace To. What I would like to be able to do is for…

    16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Caliber Feature Requests

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base